SimranLaw - Top 10 Property Advocates in Chandigarh 815 Sector 16D Chandigarh 160016 9876616815 - The Greatest Guide To lawyer

asked 2018-12-07 04:43:13 -0600

768 Though at one stage Mr. ate, he finally gave up that contention. The King(1), it was held by the Judicial Committee that prosecution for taking a bribe under s. 55 and 56 printed and published and completely ignored the true effect of the statements contained therein. Hazarnavis, learned Counsel for the first respondent attempted to support the judgment of the trial court on the ground that the appellant was disqualified to be candid. His general approach is apparent from the passage immediately preceding the words quoted: However, with great respect to him, I regret the elevation of these obiter comments, made in a very unusual legal and factual context, to statements of general principle.

edit retag flag offensive close delete